Saturday, May 18, 2013

In the upper Mid-West and East Coast, many superintendents are now well into the 'catch-up' phase of spring management programs.  After a winter that would not relent, into an active spring severe storm weather pattern with warm muggy air masses, the turf has really 'taken off', so to speak.  Obviously, a true spring weather pattern will be compressed in duration this year, as longer range forecasts look like a summer weather pattern will become dominate very soon. 

Playing 'catch-up' is never ideal and it frustrates the proper timing of maintenance practices that work better when they are properly spaced out over several days and even weeks.  Consequently, turf managers must be fast on their feet, yet not loose sight of the overall objectives and the things that need to be done.  Further, those practices that should be imposed PRIOR to the onset of stressful weather, must still be fitted into maintenance schedules. 

The soil temperatures have risen dramatically in the last seven to ten days and as a result, annual grassy weeds have been germinating rapidly and vigorously, Poa annua seedheads have emerged with abandon, and accelerated vertical growth rates are consuming carbohydrates almost as fast as the turf can produce them.  All of these factors bring me to the subject of pro-active management.  Regardless of what Mother Nature might throw at us, we have to adapt, make changes, re-set priorities at times, and keep our eye on the target.  We cannot sit back and react to our circumstances, rather we must attempt to stay ahead of those things that are happening to us in order to prepare the turf for what might be lurking on the horizon.

 For example, everyone has now been exposed to the term pre-stress conditioning in one way or another.  The drivers for pre-stress conditioning are the conservation of carbohydrate and the inclusion of bio-stimulant type chemistries that contain anti-oxidants and cytokinins to supplement the nutritional diet of the turf.  The conservation of carbohydrate is best achieved through the use of plant growth regulators, which reduces growth which, in turn, reduces consumption of the carbohydrate the turf has been working hard to produce.  The bio-stimulant products containing anti-oxidants and cytokinins improve the turf's natural defense mechanisms, and keep the turf in the strongest possible position for the continued production of new roots when adverse conditions develop ( rapidly accelerating soil and air temperatures).  In order for these practices and additions to the maintenance schedule to be the most affective, they must be initiated prior to the onset of adverse environmental conditions  (hence the term pre-stress conditioning). 

Keep managing Mother Nature the best that you can and remember that being pro-active is the best way to accomplish that goal...


Wednesday, May 1, 2013

In my recent travels, I was able to see that spring has begun to arrive.  That being said, much of the landscape of the upper Mid-West and East Coast are still behind with regard to growth and development of turfgrasses (as well as other plants in the area).  The development and emergence of annual bluegrass seedheads is several days later than last year, so PGR suppression should be better this year.  Golf course superintendents continue to vary with regard to their PGR choice from Embark to Proxy to the combination of Proxy/Primo.  The pluses and minuses of any choice remain from year to year and are not consistent from place to place.  From a percent reduction perspective, Embark continues to provide the best suppression, but it does have some baggage that Proxy/Primo applications do not typically have (injury to off target species, discoloration, etc.). 

Remember that suppressing annual bluegrass seedheads conserves carbohydrate which makes the plant stronger and better able to withstand environmental stresses during the summer months.  Therefore, if reducing the amount of annual bluegrass in the stand is one of your objectives, it is better to let it produce the head and put all your cultural programming into promoting the creeping bentgrass or what ever species you are attempting to encourage.  For example, if you are trying to convert a mixed stand of annual bluegrass and creeping bentgrass to more creeping bentgrass by using Class B PGR's, the timing of application is best when the annual bluegrass seedhead is beginning to shatter (around the end of May). 

The American Society of Agronomy (Crop Science/C-5 Turfgrass Division) has a CD available that discusses in great deal the classification system now being used for PGR's.  It is authored by myself, Dr.Joe Dipaola, and Dr.Dennis Shepherd.  This CD contains the most comprehensive explanation and discussion of plant growth regulator use on turfgrasses.  Please understand that this is not a sales pitch as the authors do not receive any compensation (the proceeds go to the society.